Notorious BIG family lose court claim - News and Gossip
Polyphonic Colour Backgrounds
Real Ring Tones Phone Animations
Fun Sounds Mobile Games
Add this page to your favourites View Frequently Asked Questions

Search for Hip Hop Music

Latest News & Gossip

Lemar cleans up at the Mobos

Don't Cha wish you were still number one

Gorillaz to be unveiled

British pair lead MTV nominations

Crazy Frog targets Christmas top spot

Robbie to team up with Little Britain star

50 Cent gives all he's worth

Hollywood is ringtone crazy!

Film to help 50s fans understand him better

Kylie loves Am I Bothered show

Hip Hop Gossip

Hip Hop News and Gossip as it happens

Notorious BIG family lose court claim

Date: 22/08/2006

The family of the Notorious BIG have lost an attempt to have the inquiry into his murder widened.

Last week, a court judge threw out their attempts to include claims that two former police officers were present and complicit in his murder in an expanded lawsuit of wrongful death against the City of Los Angeles.

The family had attempted to claim that former police officers David Mack and Rafael Perez were working for Death Row Records mogul Marion 'Suge' Knight and were involved in the fatal shooting of the legendary rapper.

Notorious BIG, real name Christopher Wallace, was killed on March 9th 1997 after a star-studded party at Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles. Based on allegations from a prison insider, the Wallace family claim that Mr Perez was at the museum on the night of the murder and alerted Mr Mack to Biggie Smalls' presence.

Last year, a judge throw out the previous trial after it was discovered that a police detective had purposefully hid information from a prison mole that linked the murder to the two officers. Declaring a mis-trial, the judge also ordered the city to pay the family $1.1 million in legal fees and other expenses.

Despite this, US District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper denied a request to extend the claims. She said there was "no admissible evidence that Perez was on duty at the scene of the murder".

Attorney Perry Sanders explained the judge's ruling means the case will remain the same as when it was first filed four years ago. The new allegation "was about a hair's difference between the original cause of action" and the new case he sought to expand, Sanders said. "We obviously still have all the same claims," he added.

The officers, Mr Knight and accused gunman Amir